The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DOUGLAS PETER MAGYARI and DAVID KEITH MAGYARI ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1923 Application No. 09/031,356 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, FLEMING and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appeal to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 26-28. Representative claim 26 is reproduced below: 26. A sound capturing device, comprising: a body portion geometrically configured to simulate the acoustic properties of a human head and torso; a first microphone coupled to the body portion for generating a first signal corresponding substantially to a vibrational frequency of said body portion in response to a received sound wave; and a second microphone affixed to the body portion and integral with the first microphone for generating a second signal corresponding substantially to aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007