Ex Parte ICHIMURA et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 19                   
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                                Ex parte ISAO ICHIMURA,                               
                            FUMISADA MAEDA, KENJI YAMAMOTO,                           
                           KIYOSHI OHSATO and TOSHIO WATANABE                         
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2001-1936                               
                              Application 09/049,478                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 1-15.                                             
               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.  A focus controlling apparatus for focusing a light beam            
          and positioning the focused light beam onto a signal recording              
          layer of a signal recording media, comprising:                              
               a light beam focusing means having a numerical aperture of             
          0.6 or more;                                                                


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007