Appeal No. 2001-2000
Application No. 08/964,096
not an instance along with actions required to conform that
stored set to the true set of indexes.” We agree.
Anderson’s figure 1 shows memory elements within part
of the overall computer environment 12. The relationship of
any version of an object discussed in this reference to
persistence (permanent storage) in any memory appears not to
be disclosed in this reference. The various versions of an
object in Anderson appear to be discussed in terms of real
time or nonpersistent, temporary storage since no fields are
modified in this reference to migrate the object as claimed
in each independent claim on appeal, that is, to
automatically store in permanent storage with a migrated
object, the initial set of fields unchanged by at least one
modification along with any action necessary to change the
initial set of fields to the modified set of fields.
With all this said, we also tend to agree with
appellants’ observations at the top of page 3 of the reply
brief. There, appellants express the view that Anderson
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007