The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte MAMORU UEDA ______________ Appeal No. 2001-2005 Application 08/893,024 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 10-15 and 17-22. Representative claim 10 is reproduced below: 10. Apparatus for processing a digital video signal, comprising: a processor for generating block units of a predetermined size from said digital video signal and adding block number information and color field information indicating a phase-shift of a subcarrier of said digital video signal to said block units, said block number information indicating the sequential order of said block units; and 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007