Ex Parte MOHINDRA - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                  today was not written for publication in a law journal                              
                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                           Paper No. 32               


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                                                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                                                                                     
                                     Ex parte RISHI MOHINDRA                                          
                                                                                                     
                                       Appeal No. 2001-2018                                           
                                   Application No. 08/668,114                                         
                                                                                                     
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                                                                                     

            Before THOMAS, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent                              
            Judges.                                                                                   
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            


                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                            
            claims 2 and 8-13.                                                                        
                  The invention is directed to a quadrature demodulator.                              
            Independent claim 12 is representative of the embodiment wherein                          
            the quadrature demodulator has a phase shifting network that                              

                                                 -1–                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007