Appeal No. 2001-2019 Application No. 08/996,567 Page 15 from the central stations by abruptly increasing or decreasing the level of the transmitted voltage (col. 10, lines 7-32). This has the great advantage of assuring that the firing instants of the flash lamps will all be referenced to a common clocking action, and in that way assure that the various firing instants all occur at the proper times and in the intended sequences. In conventional flashing lamp highway signaling systems, the difference in transmission paths creates different time constants, and the various firing instants are free running and unsynchronized with each other (col. 10, line 36 through col. 11, line 26). From the disclosure of Markl, we find that Markl synchronizes the flashing of the emergency lights to warn motorists of traffic accidents, traffic jams, road icing, etc. Because Markl teaches the use of synchronized flashing lights to warn motorists of road emergencies, we find that Markl is related to an alarm system, and would have suggested to an artisan that the flashing lights should be synchronized to overcome the problems associated with random flashing caused by differing time constants. We are not persuaded by appellants' assertion (brief, page 6) that Markl is not directed to an audible alarm orPage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007