Ex Parte TANNENBAUM - Page 6



          Appeal No. 08/911,596                                                       
          Application No. 2001-2049                                                   

          selectively modified, which disk space in Windows clearly is.  No           
          step of actual modifying is in the claim” [answer-page 14].                 
          However, while disk space is able to be selectively modified by             
          deleting programs and/or data on the disk, this is not selective            
          modification “in response to execution of the data processing               
          application,” as required by the claim language.  Moreover, while           
          the claim may not require “actual” modification, it does require            
          the capability of selective modification in response to execution           
          of the data processing application and this has not been shown,             
          by the examiner, to be disclosed by Greiner.                                
               Further, the execution of the data processing application,             
          to which the claim refers, includes “translating a first                    
          plurality of user input signals to a first plurality of                     
          translated data values.”  The examiner explains that this is a              
          broad recitation which would encompass a keyboard since a                   
          keyboard translates user inputs to transcribed values.                      
               We agree with the examiner that a keyboard does meet the               
          limitation of “translating a first plurality of user input                  
          signals to a first plurality of translated data values.”                    
          However, this phrase is not employed in a vacuum.  Rather, claim            
          34 requires that the availability of the resource is selectively            
          modified, that the modification is in response to execution of              
                                         -6–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007