Ex Parte PARSONS et al - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                                                                                                    Paper No. 25                    

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                 Ex parte WILLIAM G. PARSONS                                                        
                                                     and ROBERT W. PIEPHO                                                           
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 2001-2050                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/997,085                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                           ____________                                                             
               Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 32.                                           
                       The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing an on-hold call                     
               between a hold initiating party and a holding party.  Under the control of the holding party, a pre-                 
               recorded hold termination message may be selected and delivered to the hold initiating party.                        










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007