Ex Parte BROWN et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered           
                          today was not written for publication and                 
                             is not binding precedent of the Board                  
                                                      Paper No. 26                  
                                                                                   
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     __________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     __________                                     
                               Ex parte GENE W. BROWN                               
                               and JEFFREY E.D. ROGERS                              
                                     ___________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2001-2072                                
                             Application No. 08/910,885                             
                                     ___________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                     __________                                     
         Before OWENS, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent             
         Judges.                                                                    
         PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                  
         1-4 and 7-9.  Claim 4 has been objected to but has been indicated          
         as being allowable by the examiner on page 3 of the answer.                
         Claims 5, 6, and 10-26 have been withdrawn from consideration as           
         being directed to non-elected species.  (answer, page 2).                  
              Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, and          
         is set forth below, with the bolded text provided for emphasis:            
              1.   A disposable filter cartridge for mounting in a filter           
         housing, the filter housing including a non-planar axially                 
         extending seating surface following a ring-shaped path having no           
         structural metal parts and comprising in combination:                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007