Appeal No. 2001-2101
Application No. 09/111,495
In view of the above discussion, since the Examiner has not
established a prima facie case of obviousness, the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of independent claims 1, 14, and 20, as well
as claims 2-6, 8-13, 15-19, and 21-24 dependent thereon, is not
sustained.
In summary, we have not sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of any of the claims on appeal. Accordingly,
the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-6 and 8-24 is
reversed.
REVERSED
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007