Appeal No. 2001-2238
Application 09/387,204
claims 18-20, 22 and 23. Although dependent claim 21 has been
rejected using the additional teachings of Higuchi, Higuchi does
not overcome the deficiencies in the rejection noted above.
Therefore, we also do not sustain the rejection of claim 21.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the
rejections made by the examiner. Therefore, the decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 17-23 is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/ki
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007