Ex Parte KLEINROCK et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2260                                                        
          Application 08/712,502                                                      


               Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                       
               1.  A method for connecting a user to a computer information           
          network comprising the steps of:                                            
               providing a central processing station comprising a database           
          including an index of computer network access numbers and                   
          associated information for using the numbers;                               
               accessing the central processing station from a remote                 
          computing device through a transmission line;                               
               receiving location identifying information from the remote             
          computing device;                                                           
               comparing the received location identifying information with           
          the index of network access numbers stored in the database;                 
               selecting at least one appropriate computer network access             
          number from the database;                                                   
               downloading the selected appropriate computer network access           
          number to the remote computing device.                                      
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Abel et al. (Abel)                5,289,371      Feb. 22, 1994              
          Weinberger et al. (Weinberger)    5,425,085      June 13, 1995              
          Chinnock et al. (Chinnock)        5,426,427      June 20, 1995              
               Claims 1-9, 11, 13, 14, 17-30 and 45-47 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers            
          Chinnock in view of Weinberger with respect to claims 1, 7-9, 11,           
          13, 14, 25, 26, 45 and 46, and Abel is added to this combination            
          with respect to claims 2-6, 12, 17, 18 and 47.  Although not                


                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007