Ex Parte GIROD - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2001-2293                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/984,602                                                                                  

              teaching the respective first and second circuits.  Image signal processing circuit 105                     
              processes digital image signals to produce video signals.  Iura col. 3, ll. 45-59.                          
              Microcomputer 107 calculates the difference between coordinates in different cycles                         
              (i.e., frames), and computer apparatus 109 moves a cursor accordingly.  Id. at col. 2, l.                   
              65 - col. 3, l. 4 and col. 4, ll. 32-65.  Thus, while Iura may teach “circuits,” the rejection              
              falls short in showing disclosure or suggestion of all the claimed elements, thus failing                   
              to set forth a convincing case for unpatentability of the claimed subject matter.                           
                     Since the burden of setting forth a prima facie case for obviousness has not                         
              been met with respect to any of the independent claims, we do not sustain the section                       
              103 rejection of claims 1-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Iura and                      
              Siio.                                                                                                       


















                                                           -6-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007