Ex Parte ROBINSON et al - Page 1


                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
                                                                                       Paper No.  53                    
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     __________                                                         
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                               Ex parte HARRIET L. ROBINSON, ELLEN F. FYNAN,                                            
                                       ROBERT G. WEBSTER, and SHAN LU                                                   
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2001-2316                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/187,879                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF1                                                         
                                                     __________                                                         
                 Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
                 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       


                        This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                 
                 examiner’s final rejection of claims 44-46, 50, 51 and 81-89.  The examiner                            
                 indicated that the only other claims pending in this application, claims 62-64, 68-                    
                 70, 74, and 78-80, were allowable.  Answer, page 2.                                                    




                                                                                                                        
                 1 Appellants waived their request for oral hearing.  Paper No. 52.  Accordingly, we considered this    
                 appeal on Brief.                                                                                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007