The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOSHITAKA HONDA and YUTAKA TANAKA ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2349 Application No. 09/237,895 ____________ HEARD: January 21, 2003 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 24 through 26. Claims 1 through 18 and 27 through 31 have been allowed. Claims 19 through 23 have been canceled. Appellants' invention relates to a spark plug with either a metallic surface layer or a nickel oxide layer instead of aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007