The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SUNG-WOO KO ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2370 Application No. 09/109,403 ____________ HEARD: January 14, 2003 ____________ Before THOMAS, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-10, and 14. BACKGROUND Appellant's invention relates to a shadow mask for a flat cathode ray tube. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows: 1. A shadow mask for a flat cathode ray tube, which has a plurality of pores for discriminating electron beams emitted fromPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007