Appeal No. 2001-2423
Application 08/931,253
35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 3, 5 and 13 over Hajny in view of
additional prior art.
DECISION
The rejections of claims 1 and 3-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, written description requirement, claims 1, 4, 6
and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Sparrow, claim 3 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sparrow in view of Westbrook, claim 5 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sparrow in view of Holzl, claims 8-10 and 12
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sparrow in view of Hajny, claim 11
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sparrow in view of Hajny and common
knowledge, and claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sparrow in
view of Wolff, are reversed. The rejections of claims 1 and 4
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Hajny, claim 3 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over Hajny in view of Westbrook, claim 5 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over Hajny in view of Holzl, and claim 13 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over Hajny in view of Wolff, are affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007