Appeal No. 2001-2470 Page 3 Application No. 08/890,134 essentially for the reasons stated in the Answer and those reasons set forth below. OPINION The examiner finds that Puletti discloses hot melt adhesive formulations based on A-B-A type block copolymers, where the terminal (end) blocks of the copolymer are in a concentration of 86 to 14% and the molecular weights of these terminal blocks are preferably between 15,000 and 100,000 (Answer, page 3). The examiner also finds that the reference prefers the elastomeric block copolymers be unhydrogenated with butadiene and isoprene midblocks (Answer, paragraph bridging pages 3-4). The examiner notes that the trademark copolymers identified by Puletti are the same block copolymers specified by appellants in some of the examples (id., citing Kraton 1650 and composition D in Table 1 of the specification). The examiner further finds that Puletti teaches the use of tackifying resins which include midblock compatible resins and oils in varying amounts (Answer, page 4, with citations to Puletti). The examiner thus finds that the difference between the claimed subject matter and the disclosure of Puletti is that the claimed weight ratio of midblock compatible resin to oil (1.5:1 to 3.5:1) is “not expressly and specifically cited within the patent.” Answer, page 4. However, the examiner concludes that this weight ratio is prima facie obvious since ratios of midblockPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007