Ex Parte STEARNS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2573                                                         
          Application No. 09/070,486                                                   

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                             
               1.   A method for converting digitized image pixel values from          
          a first range to a second range, the method comprising the steps             
          of:                                                                          
               (a) determining a lower limit value of a relevant portion of            
          the first range based upon non-log transformed pixel values;                 
               (b) generating an intensity histogram representative of pixel           
          populations having specified intensities, and transforming the               
          histogram to generate a log-transformed histogram;                           
               (c) identifying a threshold value for an upper limit of log-            
          transformed values from the log-transformed histogram;                       
               (d) identifying a population of pixels having log-transformed           
          values having a desired relationship to the threshold value;                 
               (e) determining an upper limit value of the relevant portion            
          of the first range based upon the identified population; and                 
               (f) converting the non-log transformed pixel values to                  
          converted values over the second range based upon the lower and              
          upper limit values.                                                          
          The examiner relies on the following references:                             
          Hara et al. (Hara)            4,950,894          Aug. 21, 1990               
          Shimura                       5,060,081          Oct. 22, 1991               
          Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)  5,757,022          May  26, 1998               
          (filed Oct. 17, 1996)                                                        
          Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                     
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Kobayashi in view of             
          Shimura with respect to claims 1-6, 8-10 and 14-19, and the                  
          examiner adds Hara with respect to claims 7, 11-13 and 20.                   





                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007