The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS A. GREENWOOD and THOMAS W. PASTUSAK ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2603 Application No. 08/867,857 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 9, 10, 14, 15, 17 and 18. Claims 1-8, 11-13, 16 and 19-23 have been allowed by the examiner. The invention pertains to machine control. In particular, the invention involves static optical machine control (SOMaC) which uses an absolute ranging laser tracking system or its equivalent to measure the position and orientation of the machine end effector when the machine is stationary.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007