Ex Parte GREENWOOD et al - Page 1




                                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                  
                                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 27                 

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                                 ____________                                                                    
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                                 ____________                                                                    
                                                 Ex parte THOMAS A. GREENWOOD and                                                                
                                                          THOMAS W. PASTUSAK                                                                     
                                                                 ____________                                                                    
                                                             Appeal No. 2001-2603                                                                
                                                          Application No. 08/867,857                                                             
                                                                 ____________                                                                    
                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                                 ____________                                                                    
                 Before KRASS, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                 KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                             



                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 9, 10, 14, 15, 17 and 18.                               
                 Claims 1-8, 11-13, 16 and 19-23 have been allowed by the examiner.                                                              
                         The invention pertains to machine control.  In particular, the invention involves static optical                        
                 machine control (SOMaC) which uses an absolute ranging laser tracking system or its equivalent to                               
                 measure the position and orientation of the machine end effector when the machine is stationary.                                








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007