The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PABLO MARTIN RODRIGUEZ
and KENT R. TOWNLEY
______________
Appeal No. 2001-2660
Application 09/392,341
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-13. Because the examiner
has indicated at page 2 of the answer that two of the three
rejections of the claims on appeal made under 35 U.S.C. § 103
have been withdrawn, including the rejection of claims 6 and 7,
only claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8-13 remain for our consideration on
appeal.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007