Ex Parte YAMASAKI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2662                                                        
          Application No. 09/124,962                                                  


                    a comparator for comparing a voltage on a second                  
               internal power supply line with said first internal power              
               supply voltage and outputting a signal indicating a result             
               of the comparison;                                                     
                    a current drive element connected between a power                 
               supply node receiving said external power supply voltage and           
               said second internal power supply line for supplying a                 
               current from said power supply node onto said second                   
               internal power supply line in accordance with said signal              
               outputted from said comparator;                                        
                    a first internal circuit coupled to receive the first             
               internal power supply voltage as an operating power supply             
               voltage thereof, for performing a predetermined operation;             
               and                                                                    
                    a second internal circuit coupled to receive the                  
               voltage on the second internal power supply line as an                 
               operating power supply voltage thereof, for performing                 
               another predetermined operation.                                       
               The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                  
          Lim et al. (Lim)              5,929,696            Jul. 27, 1999            
          (filed Oct. 17, 1997)                                                       
               Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as             
          being anticipated by Lim.1                                                  
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant and the              
          examiner, reference is made to the supplemental brief filed on              
          February 21, 2001 and the reply brief, as well as the answer.               




               1At page 2 of the answer, the examiner has withdrawn a                 
          separate rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                       
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007