Ex Parte EHNEBUSKE et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0001                                                        
          Application No. 08/989,674                                                  

               1.   A method, implemented in a computer system, for                   
               providing user indications for manipulating the                        
               operation of an object-oriented object, comprising the                 
               steps of:                                                              
                    identifying and describing a plurality of triggers                
               for a plurality of control points for said                             
               object-oriented object on a static object model;                       
                    attaching a notation to each of said plurality of                 
               triggers describing a before, during and after                         
               operation related to said plurality of triggers on said                
               static object model;                                                   
                    binding one of said plurality of triggers to one                  
               of said plurality of control points for said                           
               object-oriented object in said computer system based                   
               upon said notation; and                                                
                    displaying results of said identifying step and                   
               binding step based upon said notation to a user at said                
               computer system.                                                       
               The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                  
          Martin, “Principles of Objected-Oriented Analysis and Design”,              
          Prentice Hall (1993) Chapters 9-11, pages 111-168. 1                        
               Claims 5 through 8 stand rejected under the enabling                   
          portion of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.  Claims 1                
          through 3, 5 through 7 and 9 through 11 stand rejected under 35             
          U.S.C.   § 102(a, b) as being anticipated by Martin.  Finally,              
          claims 4, 8, and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As               
          evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Martin alone.             


               1 Only these noted portions of this reference have been provided to us 
          by the examiner notwithstanding certain indications in the answer that the  
          examiner relies upon the entire book.                                       
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007