Appeal No. 2002-0068 Page 10
Application No. 09/102,038
show the second HTML file. We will not "resort to speculation," In re Warner, 379 F.2d
1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 178 (CCPA 1967), as to such teachings. Therefore, we
reverse the anticipation rejection of claim 5.
The examiner does not allege, let alone show, that the addition of Peercy cures
the aforementioned deficiency of HTML 4. Absent a teaching or suggestion of receiving
control information from a browser, the control information being derived from execution
of an applet in a first HTML page and relating a file name for a second HTML file with a
command to show the second HTML file, we are unpersuaded of a prima facie case of
obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 6.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claim 5 under § 102(a) is reversed. The rejections
of claims 1-4 and 6-16 under § 103(a) are also reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007