The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN W. FOX and MICHAEL W. WOOD ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0105 Application No. 09/398,891 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL John W. Fox and Michael W. Wood appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-15, all the claims pending in the application. We reverse. Appellants’ invention pertains to a method of playing a card game on an electronic video gaming machine. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a readingPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007