Appeal No. 2002-0l08
Application No.09/200,981
Accordingly, since the examiner has not convinced us of an
adequate motivation to combine the teachings of Lane and Maes, we
will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-8 under
35 U.S.C. § 103. Since Fujieda does not provide for the
deficiencies of the primary references, we also will not sustain
the rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EAK/dal
-8–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007