The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte EDWARD M. SCHEIDT and C. JAY WACK
Appeal No. 2002-0121
Application No. 09/023,672
ON BRIEF
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 35, 36 and 66. Claims 3-34, 37-65 and 67-69 have
been indicated by the examiner (answer-page 3) as being directed
to allowable subject matter and are no longer on appeal before
us.
The invention is directed to cryptographic systems. More
particularly, the invention relates to formulating cryptographic
-1–
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007