Appeal No. 2002-0145 Application No. 09/090,990 machine for handling direct text or HTML, with the ability to convert one form into the other, concluding that it would have been obvious to incorporate the conversion and delivery methods provided by Pallmann into the conversion and delivery system of Tang in order to provide an improved method of conversion of data to be transmitted to users over a network. Our review of Tang convinces us of the correctness of appellant’s position, at page 28 of the principal brief, wherein appellant asserts that Tang teaches that components are converted into equivalent components whose types are compatible with all the different transmission media and not with the recipient’s requirements/preferences, as urged by the examiner. If components are converted into equivalent components whose types are compatible with all the different transmission media, this does not appear relevant to the claimed features of creating an HTML document, checking the designated recipients for HTML capability and sending the document to designated recipients in accordance with the recipient’s HTML capability. Moreover, since Pallmann is directed to adding plug-ins between a data source and a data target, it is unclear what would have motivated an artisan to combine these references in the manner sought by the examiner. As appellant points out, at pages 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007