Ex Parte Kaulbach et al - Page 13

              Appeal No. 2002-0184                                                                     -13-               
              Application No. 09/058,537                                                                                  



              Finally, we shall not sustain the above rejection as none of references, each of which                      
              has been fully discussed supra teaches, discloses or suggests the requisite melt flow index                 
              ratio of 80 to 2500 as required by the claimed subject matter.                                              




















                                                      DECISION                                                            

              The rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 16 through 20 under 35 U. S. C. § 112,                              
              first paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in               
              such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventors, at                
              the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention is reversed.                    












Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007