The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RONALD J. TONUCCI
and
DOUGLAS H. PEARSON
__________
Appeal No. 2002-0204
Application 09/154,2431
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 22 through 27 and 30.
See the Brief, pages 1-2. Claim 28 and 29, the remaining claims
in the above-identified application, have been objected to as
being dependent upon a rejected claim, but have been indicated to
1
1Application for patent filed September 16, 1998.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007