Appeal No. 2002-0278
Application 08/797,674
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 13, 15 through 18 and 24
through 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based upon a public use or
sale of the invention, and we have not sustained the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1 through 3, 8, 24, 26, 27, 30 and 32 under
35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) based upon anticipation. In addition, we
have not sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 4-7, 9, 10
through 13, 15 through 18, 25 through 29 and 31 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
MAHSHID SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF:pgc
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007