Appeal No. 2002-0294
Application No. 09/067,806
It is the examiner’s position that Bachman discloses a system which includes
arranging internet data stored as separate non-correlated data records that relate to
internet data records with individual users, citing Bachman’s abstract, Figure 2, and
column 3, lines 4-6. The examiner further contends that Bachman’s secure token is
equivalent to the claimed “Internet data records with individual users.” The examiner
cites column 3, lines 18-21, and Figure 2 for the claimed “forming a page map;” cites
column 3, lines 25-30, and Figure 2 for the claimed “forming a user session map;” and
column 3, lines 30-47, lines 66-67, and column 4, lines 1-3, for the claimed “forming a
user session page map.”
We have reviewed the portions of Bachman cited by the examiner but we find no
mention of the claimed “page map,” “user session map,” or “user session page map.”
Of course, an analysis of the claim language initially entails assigning a meaning
to the specific claim terms.
Instant Figure 4, together with pages 15-17 of the instant specification, describes
the claimed “page map” as being formed by the steps shown in the flowchart of Figure
4. At the very least, formation of the page map entails collecting data from web and
proxy server logs. Similarly, reference to Figure 7 shows that, at the very least,
formation of a user session map entails the collection of data from server, proxy and
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007