Ex Parte ALLEN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0349                                                        
          Application No. 09/442,352                                                  


          access to partially-degraded data suitable for browsing or                  
          research, and charging users a royalty to receive a higher                  
          quality version of the data suitable for other purposes.                    


               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.  A method of delivering data over a telephone                       
          communication network utilizing bidirectional communication while           
          preserving widespread online access for a first class of use for            
          limited purposed and ensuring proper payment of royalties for a             
          second class of unrestricted use, the method comprising the steps           
          of:                                                                         
               generating a partially-degraded version of the data suitable           
          for the first class of use, but unsuitable for the second class             
          of use, by altering a portion of the data to reduce its perceived           
          quality when utilized;                                                      
               providing the partially-degraded version of the data over              
          the network to a customer online at a user terminal connected to            
          the network in response to a customer request made utilizing the            
          user terminal and transmitted over the network; and                         
               providing a higher quality version of the data suitable for            
          the second class of unrestricted use to the customer over the               
          network if the customer is entitled to receive the higher quality           
          version.                                                                    

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Stringer et al. (Stringer)    5,341,429         Aug. 23, 1994               
          Hornbuckle     5,388,211       Feb.  7, 1995                                
          Ananda                        5,495,411         Feb. 27, 1996               

               Claims 1-5, 7-11, 17-28, 31-33 and 37-39 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stringer in view of              

                                         -2–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007