Ex Parte MIU et al - Page 1




                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
                                          is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                                                                                        Paper No. 24          
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                            Ex parte DENNY K. MIU                                             
                                                      and                                                     
                                                WEILONG TANG                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal No. 2002-0388                                            
                                            Application No. 08/937,859                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before WARREN, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
            TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This appeal involves claims 1-12 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We  
            have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                          














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007