The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KATHY J. POTECHIN,
ERIC P. GUENIN,
XIAOZHONG TANG,
JAIRAJH MATTAI,
ELIZABETH LINN,
WILSON LEE, and
PAUL J. VINCENTI
__________
Appeal No. 2002-0441
Application No. 09/273,152
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8-22, 24, 27-30 and 32-39. Claim 2 is
representative of the subject matter on appeal, and reads as follows:
2. A cosmetic composition made by combining:
(a) at least one active cosmetic material selected from the group
consisting of antiperspirant active materials and deodorant active materials;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007