Ex Parte PI SUBIRANA et al - Page 2


                Appeal No.  2002-0448                                                   Page 2                
                Application No.  09/194,824                                                                   
                          wherein R1 is an alkyl and/or alkenyl group containing from 6 to 22                 
                          carbon atoms, and n is a number from 20 to 150, and wherein the                     
                          reaction product has a Brookfield viscosity of at least 2,000 mPas, as              
                          measured using a 5% by weight sample of the reaction product in                     
                          water.                                                                              
                      The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                         
                Tesmann et al. (Tesmann)        5,034,159                Jul.  23, 1991                      
                Pereira et al. (Pereira)        5,302,377                Apr. 12, 1994                       
                European Patent Application                                                                   
                Turchini et al. (Turchini)      0 199 131                Oct. 29, 1986                       
                                         GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                 
                      Claims 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,                    
                as being indefinite in the recitation of the phrase “viscosity-increasing effective           
                amount.”1                                                                                     
                      Claims 11-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), as being                          
                anticipated by Turchini.                                                                      
                      Claims 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as being                             
                unpatentable over Pereira in view of Turchini and Tesmann.                                    
                      We reverse.                                                                             









                                                                                                              
                1 We note that the examiner failed to identify this rejection as pending under the “Grounds of
                Rejection” section of the Answer.  Nevertheless, given the examiner’s response to appellants’ 
                arguments, see Answer, pages 13-14, it appears that the examiner intended to maintain this    
                rejection.  Accordingly, we have included this rejection as part of our deliberations.        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007