Ex Parte MAJUMDER et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 20                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                  Ex parte GOPAL CHANDRA MAJUMDER,                                            
                                          MAHITOSH MANDAL, and                                                
                                            SASWATI BANERJEE                                                  
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2002-0449                                              
                                          Application No. 09/037,409                                          
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WINTERS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 1-8 and 10-18, all of the claims remaining.  Claims 1, 13,          
                and 18 are representative and read as follows:                                                
                      1.     An isolated sperm motility-promoting glycoprotein macromolecule                  
                             having a molecular mass of 66 kda and purified to homogeneity.                   
                      13.    A process for the preparation of the isolated sperm motility-                    
                             promoting glycoprotein macromolecule of claim 1, said process                    
                             comprising:                                                                      
                             fractionating at least one of buffalo serum and buffalo plasma to                
                             provide a fractionated preparation; and                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007