Ex Parte LEE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0477                                                        
          Application No. 09/115,996                                                  


               The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus              
          for removing co-channel interference in a simulcast receiver for            
          receiving a high definition television (HDTV) signal having a               
          digital format and an analog broadcasting TV signal by detecting            
          either a synchronous signal or a reference signal from the analog           
          broadcasting TV signal.                                                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1. A co-channel interference canceler in a simulcast                   
          receiver for receiving a high definition television (HDTV) signal           
          having a digital format and an analog broadcasting TV signal,               
          comprising:                                                                 
               a detector for detecting a synchronous signal from said                
          analog broadcasting TV signal, determining whether or not the               
          analog TV signal is received based on whether or not the                    
          synchronous signal is detected, and outputting a detection signal           
          indicating whether or not the analog TV signal is received;                 
               a co-channel interference rejection filter for removing co-            
          channel interference from a first input signal including co-                
          channel interference and outputting a second input signal; and              
               a selector for selecting either the first or second input              
          signal according to said detection signal.                                  
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Citta et al. (Citta)     5,821,988                Oct. 13, 1998             
                                                 (filed Dec. 19, 1995)               
               Claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)           
          as being anticipated by Citta.                                              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007