Ex Parte FIELDEN - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                             Paper No. 16              
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                     ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                              Ex parte KENT G. FIELDEN                                                 
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2002-0490                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/152,751                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     A patent examiner rejected claims 16-27.  The appellant appeals therefrom                         
              under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                   


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The invention at issue on appeal executes "load instructions."  (Spec. at 1.)  A                  
              microprocessor executes a load instruction to retrieve data from a memory.  Such an                      
              instruction specifies an address at which data of interest are stored and how much data                  
              are to be retrieved.  (Id. at 2.)                                                                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007