Ex Parte HUNT et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2002-0515                                                                                                  
               Application No. 09/222,092                                                                                            


                       c) a lens for imaging visible light onto a focal plane,                                                       
                       d) a video camera positioned at the focal plane of the lens which converts the                                
                       visible light waves that have passed through the filter and the lens into an                                  
                       electrical signal, and                                                                                        
                       e) a device capable of correlating images received by the video camera to                                     
                       binder dosage and distribution on the composite-forming material to which                                     
                       binder has been applied contacted by the ultraviolet waves emitted by the UV                                  
                       light source.                                                                                                 

                                                        CITED PRIOR ART                                                              
                       As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following references:                              
               Krueger et al.  (Krueger)                    4,415,516                        Nov. 15 , 1983                          
               Bolton et al.  (Bolton)                      4,824,209                        Apr.  25, 1989                          
               DeVries et al.  (DeVries)                    5,532,817                        Jul.    2, 1996                         
               Duclos et al.  (Duclos)                      5,818,577                        Oct.  6, 1998                           
               Barrera et al.  (Barrera)                    6,001,936                        Dec. 14, 1999                           
               Burchill                                     EP 0458474                       Nov. 27, 1991                           
                       The Examiner has rejected claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 11-15, 19 and 20 as unpatentable                              
               under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by DeVries; claim 3 as unpatentable under 35                                  
               U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of DeVries and Bolton; claim 4 as                                     
               unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of DeVries and                                  
               Duclos; claims 5, 8, 10 and 18 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                               
                                                                -3-                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007