Ex Parte WNUK - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                            Paper No. 25             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                              Ex parte JOSEPH WNUK                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2002-0543                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/118,629                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and LEVY Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1 and 3-10.  The appellant appeals therefrom                   
             under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm.                                                                   


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention at issue on appeal illuminates a switch assembly for a vehicle.                    
             Modern vehicles include electrical input switches for locking and unlocking doors,                      
             opening and closing windows, and controlling seats.  Such a switch may include                          
             backlighting to help an occupant locate the switch in the dark; the backlighting is                     
             operated simultaneously with the vehicle's headlights.  When the headlights are                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007