The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte OLE FRIIS KNUDSEN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0552 Application No. 09/117,603 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 3, the only claim remaining in this application. Claims 1, 2 and 4 have been canceled. As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant's invention relates to a housing for an electrical device, such as a measuring transducer, wherein at least one electrical lead is introduced into the housing through the wall of the housing and is sealed against the wall by a sealant. More particularly,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007