The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GARY L. OWEN, SARAH BARBER, and GEORGE W. PALMER ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0553 Application No. 09/391,782 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 through 6, 8, and 13 through 18 . These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellants’ invention pertains to an avionics FMS, an avionics display, and a method of adjusting a display of FMS information to a pilot. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 2, 14, and 18,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007