Ex Parte HILDRETH - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0561                                                        
          Application No. 09/410,531                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads         
          as follows:                                                                 
               1.   A system for performing data mining applications,                 
                    comprising:                                                       
               (a) a computer having one or more data storage devices                 
          connected thereto;                                                          
               (b) a relational database management system, executed by the           
          computer, for managing a relational database stored on the data             
          storage devices; and                                                        
               (c) an analytic algorithm for clustering performed by the              
          computer, wherein the analytic algorithm for clustering includes            
          SQL statements performed by the relational database management              
          system for reducing data retrieved from the relational database in          
          bulk by reducing the number of columns or rows in the data, the             
          analytic algorithm for clustering includes programmatic iteration           
          for operating on the reduced data to find clusters therein, and the         
          analytic algorithm for clustering creates at least one analytic             
          model within an analytic logical data model from the reduced data.          
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          McElhiney                     5,710,915           Jan. 20, 1998             
               Claims 1 through 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as         
          being unpatentable over McElhiney.                                          
               Reference is made to the final rejection (paper number 8), the         
          briefs (paper numbers 11 and 14) and the answer (paper number 13)           
          for the respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.             






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007