Appeal No. 2002-0582
Application No. 09/083,936
that the Examiner can read on Appellant's claim language by a
prior art interval box.
Mune discloses in column 1, lines 50-51, that Figures 5 and
6 are partial greatly enlarged, sectional views taken along the
lines 5-5 and 6-6, respectively, in Figure 3. Turning to Figure
3, the sectional lines show that Figure 5 and Figure 6 are solely
part of the housing and are not made up of the arc box and the
arc cover.
Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kakizoe and Mune in view of Manthe. Upon our
review of Manthe, we find that Manthe teaches a gas blow-off
opening section formed by an arc box and an arc cover.
Therefore, we will not sustain this rejection for the same
reasons as stated above.
66
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007