Ex Parte GALLAGHER et al - Page 4


                    Appeal No.  2002-0608                                                                     Page 4                        
                    Application No.  09/294,173                                                                                             

                    prior art would lead the ordinary artisan to combine the relevant teachings of the                                      
                    references to arrive at the claimed invention.  See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071,                                          
                    1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598-99 (Fed. Cir. 1988).  The findings of fact underlying                                         
                    the obviousness rejection, as well as the conclusions of law, must be made in                                           
                    accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706 (A), (E) (1994).                                         
                    See Zurko v. Dickinson, 527 U.S. 150, 158, 119 S.Ct. 1816, 1821, 50 USPQ2d                                              
                    1930, 1934 (1999).  Findings of fact underlying the obviousness rejection, upon                                         
                    review by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, must be supported by                                            
                    substantial evidence within the record.  See In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1315,                                       
                    53 USPQ2d 1769, 1775 (Fed. Cir. 2000).  In addition, in order for meaningful                                            
                    appellate review to occur, the examiner must present a full and reasoned                                                
                    explanation of the rejection.  See, e.g., In re Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1342, 61                                            
                    USPQ2d 1430, 1432 (Fed. Cir. 2002).                                                                                     
                            Baravetto teaches that the shampoo compositions contain an insoluble                                            
                    hair component, wherein the component comprises a first conditioning agent                                              
                    having a mean particle size less than 2 microns, and a second conditioning                                              
                    agent having a mean particle size greater than about 5 microns.  Id. at col. 11,                                        
                    lines 26-34.  With respect to the particle sizes, Baravetto specifically teaches:                                       
                            The first non-volatile conditioning agent in the present invention                                              
                            (the smaller particles) have a mean particle size below about 2                                                 
                            microns, preferably below about 1 micron, more preferably below                                                 
                            about 0.5 microns, even more preferably below about 0.3 microns,                                                
                            even more preferably below about 0.15 microns, and most                                                         
                            preferably below about 0.05 microns, and preferably greater than                                                
                            about 0.01 microns.  The second non-volatile conditioning agent in                                              
                            the present invention (the larger particles) have a mean particle                                               
                            size range greater than about 5 microns, preferably from about 5                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007