Ex Parte BENSON et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2002-0617                                                         
          Application 08/942,743                                                       


               Davis,2 D. et al., “Cryptographic Randomness from Air                   
               Turbulence in Disk Drive”, Advances in Cryptology: Crypto               
               ‘94, Springer Verlag, pp 114-120.                                       
               Menezes,3 A. et al., Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC              
               Press, pp 405-424, 1997.                                                

               Rosen, N.D., Examiner’s Affidavit, June 11, 1999                        
                              Rejections at Issue                                      
               Claims 1, 3, 4, 10 through 16, 18, 25, 37 and 41 through 46             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over              
          Kanevsky in view of Menezes.  Claim 5 stands rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kanevsky, and Menezes             
          in view of Hellman.  Claims 6 through 8 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kanevsky, Menezes, and            
          Hellman in view of Davis.  Claim 40 stands rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kanevsky, and Menezes             
          in view of Linsker.  Claims 1, 3, 4, 10 through 18, 37 and 41                
          through 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     




               2 The information for this reference was provided in the                
          Information disclosure Statement filed June 4, 1998 (paper No.               
          5).  We presume the year is 1994.                                            
               3 The Examiner has not established that this reference was              
          published before the Appellants’ October 2, 1997, because the                
          published date just shows that it was published in 1997.                     
                                           4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007