Appeal No. 2002-0633
Application No. 08/978,012
b) providing in the client computer database
a unique list of Internet addresses, for each client
computer, for accessing desired files on said
Internet network by the client computer;
c) providing in the network server database a list of
Internet addresses for said desired files on said
network and addresses of said client computers that
have accessed said desired files on said network;
d) receiving notification of new Internet addresses, at
the network server, from owners of said desired
files;
e) updating in the network server database at least one
of said addresses for said desired files on said
network; and
f) transferring from said network server database to
the database of said client computers having
addresses in said network server database the
updated at least one of said addresses for said
desired files on said network.
The following references are relied on by the examiner:
Inakoshi 5,933,604 Aug. 3, 1999
(filing date Nov. 5, 1996)
Noble 5,978,842 Nov. 2, 1999
(filing date Jul. 18, 1997)
Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Noble in
view of Inakoshi.
Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the
examiner, reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007