Ex Parte FISCHER et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and            
                                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                          Paper No. 19              
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                      Ex parte EUGENE C. FISCHER, DALE A. SOWELL,                                                   
                                         JOHN P. WEHRLE, and ALBERT G. HOLDER                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 2002-0639                                                         
                                                     Application No. 09/372,602                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                           ____________                                                             
               Before KRATZ, TIMM, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   



                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This appeal involves claims 1-6, 9-21, 23-28, and 34-41, which are all the claims                            
               currently pending.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                      















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007