The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD SCOTT SCHWERDTFEGER JAMES WINTHROP THATCHER and LAWRENCE FRANK WEISS ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0653 Application No. 09/121,747 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 44. The disclosed invention relates to an interactive display interface, and means for dynamically storing a database model of the data content of the display interface. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A computer controlled display system with an interactive display interface comprising: means for dynamically storing a database model of the data content of said display interface, means in said database model for sensing displayed data content in said interface, andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007